Ever since I got the Mellotron bug (in early 2006), I’ve followed closely the work of such artists as Genesis and Yes, listening with longing to the heavenly tones produced by this marvelous instrument. My favorite banks are the violins and the 8 Choir, both of which reside on the M400. I never much cared for the MkII sounds, which I find too mid-rangy and shrill. Imagine my surprise, then, when I discovered that many M400 sounds are merely reworked MkII variants.
Fast forward a year-and-a-half. I had set my sights on the ultimate prize: a Mellotron (substitute) of my own! I started with the GForce M-Tron—though a wonderful collection insofar as scope, just somewhat lacking in sound quality. Try as I might, as I said in my review, most of the sounds I sought just eluded me. Fast forward a little over half a year again, to the summer of 2008. When trolling the Internet one evening, I came upon this website, and all my dreams came true. Contained here, for all to discover, are complete Mellotron banks, recorded note-by-note from a real M400 stocked with brand new Streetly Electronics tape frames.
There was just one problem. The violins bank offered was the MkII variant. It looked as though I had some work to do.
Upon compiling these individual files into a SoundFont, I loaded the bank into Cubase and got to work. Sadly, going on what I’d heard countless times before (even from Streetly itself), simply rolling off the high end does not do the trick. Several fruitless sessions later, I concluded that there was something Streetly wasn’t telling us, either by accidental or deliberate oversight. Eventually, I set aside this SoundFont and didn’t do much with it for several more months.
Just last week, I unearthed some work I had been doing with an M-Tron bank, the “MkII Vintage Violins.” My intent was to make this resemble the M400 sound. Though it’s in the ball park, something in the sonic character just isn’t there. That, and of course being an M-Tron sound it has that harsh, off-putting high end that nothing I can do seems to alleviate. Just today I brought up that M-Tron bank again and, in total disgust at the end result, I sought a project I had long abandoned—the Streetly MkII 3 Violins samples.
To keep a long story short, after half a day and multiple sessions, I have at long last uncovered what it was Streetly Electronics did to the MkII bank over 38 years ago to make it suitable for the M400. Everything you know is wrong. Streetly did not touch the high end. They notched the midrange.
But it’s not as simple as just that. There’s a whole hell of a lot involved here. I imagine that the final result came about exactly the way I accomplished it: trial and error, and a really good ear. You see, there are glaring errors with the MkII sound. For one, it has a lot of nasty upper midrange frequencies that, while they lend the sound its characteristic timbre, also grate against the ear and cause fatigue. This is indicative of an awful source recording, which makes since because this particular bank was recorded in 1953. And herein lies the secret: this is something you could do yourself, given a very good ear, an EQ, and enough time. All you had to do was identify what it was you wanted to change about the sound, and then try to affect that result with your EQ.
This is precisely what Streetly did, and I imagine the final result wasn’t very pretty on paper all written out. All told, a lot of volume would have been lost, which would have been compensated for with increaed gain on the final output. This, I believe, is why Streetly decided to refer to its changes as “high end roll-off”: it would take far too long to list it out otherwise, and most people probably wouldn’t understand it anyway.
So, at the end of all this, one thing holds true: if you have a MkII 3 Violins bank, it is theoretically possible to recreate the M400 strings using EQ. I have 35 MkII samples compiled in a SoundFont, and I have done just that with them.
Without further ado, the particulars:
First of all, I ended up using three separate instances of the A0 Parametric EQ. This freebie VST continues to prove its worth in my studio, and I use it for all my EQ work. Doubtless better EQ modules exist, and any parametric EQ will work, so long as it offers controls over the width of band notches and the slope of pass filters. I also topped it off with a favorite plug-in of mine, the venerable Ferox. This simulates the slight generational loss/tape saturation experienced when gain was applied to the original tapes after EQ processing. Finally, two obvious things missing here are the SoundFont compiler (Vienna SoundFont Studio) and, of course, the source of these wonderful samples. You may find them here at the wonderful Leisureland, USA page. Why do I not simply post a link to my SoundFont? Well, I’m not sure I can do that; the owner of Leisureland and/or Streetly might be upset with me if I did. So all I can do is tell people how to do what I did and where I found the (free) component parts.
The A0 Parametric EQ has eight separate parameters: four bands, two shelves (high- and low-), and two pass filters (also high- and low-). As I said, I used a sequence of three instances of this plug-in. The following is a breakdown—arranged by instance—of my settings.
First Instance:
-High-Pass: 196 Hz
-Band: 440 Hz, width 2 Oct, -12.00 dB
-Band: 1480 Hz, width 1 Oct, -3.00 dB
-Band: 2960 Hz, width 2 Oct, -12.00 dB
-Band: 5920 Hz, width 1 Oct, -6.00 dB
Second Instance:
-Low-Pass: 11,000 Hz, slope 12 dB/Oct, 0%
-Band: 292 Hz, width 1 Oct, -3.00 dB
-Band: 784 Hz, width 1 Oct, -3.00 dB
-Band: 3520 Hz, width 1 Oct, -9.00 dB
Third Instance:
-Band: 392 Hz, width 2 Oct, -6.00 dB
-Band: 1760 Hz, width 1 Oct, -9.00 dB
Taken together, though some consolidation might be possible, these add up to what Streetly Electronics did to sweeten those MkII strings for use in the M400. Is it exactly what they did? Not a chance in hell, but it’s damned close—as will be borne out in the following examples. There is one thing, though: I said that Streetly didn’t do anything to the top end at all, and yet I included a low-pass filter. What gives? Well, the only reason I included this filter is because the hiss was very noticeable otherwise, particularly in chords. Thankfully, the hiss was located mainly above the actual frequency response of the instrument itself, and the filter gets rid of it with minimal loss to the actual signal. I assume the hiss was a specific element of the samples I had (and the particular Mellotron that played them) and probably did not exist in the original master tapes that Streetly had at its disposal.
And I haven’t forgotten: in the Ferox plug-in, I used the “Analog circuitry sim” preset but lowered the output gain to 0 dB.
My first example is right off Streetly’s own website, Mellotronics.com. The link is to an audio example of their own, authentic M400 Strings offering. The second link is my own approximation of the example using the MkII Violins without any EQ. The final link is that same approximation, but this time with my EQ and the Ferox effect added. The final two examples are both normalized to -12.7 dB (an arbitrary number based on the highest peak in the EQ’ed example).
-Streetly M400
-MkII
-MkII EQ’ed
Notice how, though the two are fairly close, the Streetly M400 Strings manage to have a greater clarity and silkiness that my EQ’ed MkII strings just don’t quite achieve. Considering Streetly had the original master tapes to work with, while I had essentially a Mellotron bank, it comes as no surprise that Streetly’s results will sound better. But not by much, and in context, it’s a difference you wouldn’t really notice. Part of the deficit is due to the low-pass filter cutting a little of the sparkle off the top end, but mostly it’s due to the generational loss when the sound was transferred to the Mellotron tapes.
My next example is from one of my all-time favorite Genesis songs, “Mad Man Moon.” The M400 Strings were used to exquisite effect in this song (Tony Banks is an underrated genius), and for the first time I was able to emulate one of these passages with something approaching the splendor of the original Mellotron M400 that was used. The example following it is the M-Tron bank I had been using prior to this new M400 formulation.
-“Mad Man Moon”
-“Mad Man Moon” (M-Tron)
There’s something rather interesting about this track, aside from its singular beauty: it’s sharp. Half of the A Trick of the Tail album is sharp, which makes me wonder if the master tapes might not have warped a little over time, or more likely that they might have been recorded on a slightly slow reel-to-reel. In any event, in order to play along with this track, I had to bend the pitch up a bit. I needed to find a SoundFont host capable of fine pitch adjustment, and one such host is Font!, a lightweight but very capable VST plug-in. It also has velocity sensitivity adjustment, which saves me having to turn off velocity at the controller level (Mellotrons are not velocity-sensitive, you see). But, back on topic, play this bank along with the track, and it’s indistinguishable from the real Mellotron M400. Not bad at all. Notice how, though decent, the M-Tron example just doesn’t compare to the EQ’ed MkII example.
Finally, here’s the ultimate test: a real M400(0). The following YouTube video features a piece of eye candy demonstrating the various features of a brand new Mellotron, playing brand-new Streetly tapes. Play along with her, and I swear you can’t tell them apart (except for the crappy YouTube sound quality). Ladies and gentlemen, that’s a real Mellotron. You don’t get more canon than that.
So, after all this, what have we accomplished? Well, we’ve settled an age-old mystery. Streetly routinely states that the M400 Strings are just MkII ones with the high-end rolled off and some individual notes tweaked. Actually attempting to make M400 Strings from MkII ones using this prescribed method proves futile. Instead, Streetly must have actually done a lot of midrange notching in order to iron out the nasty, shrill tone of the MkII strings. And now, thanks to my painstaking work, so can you. Follow my settings or, if you desire, tweak them to taste if you think you can come even closer. And, remember, what I have done just produces the straight, full-on, unfiltered variant of the sound. To emulate the work done by Rick Wakeman in Yes, for example, you’ll need to (ironically) roll off the high end in addition to the settings I have listed.
Like I said, if I were sure I could legally do so, I’d save everybody the trouble and offer a SoundFont containing all 35 pre-processed samples for free download. As it is, I can tell you exactly what I did and point you in the direction of each of the component parts. I hope all this helps somebody out there who was looking for a way to faithfully emulate M400 Strings. If you prefer the MkII variant, well, to each his own, but I think you’re mental.
EDIT: As I knew I would, I’ve refined this process since I wrote this blog. Basically, I’ve discovered that by modulating the third EQ instance, I can achieve various different M400 Strings sounds favored by various artists. For instance, the settings indicated above work best for Genesis compositions. If you’re after the Yes sound, however, your third EQ instance should look like this:
-High Shelf: 2093 Hz, -11.00 dB
-Band: 272 Hz, width 2 Oct, -6.00 dB
-Band: 392 Hz, width 2 Oct, -6.00 dB
-Band: 1760 Hz, width 2 Oct, -15.00 dB
The exquisitely smooth tone I used for the Suspension Chords example uses the following:
-High Shelf: 4435 Hz, -6.00 dB
-Band: 392 Hz, width 2 Oct, -6.00 dB
-Band: 1760 Hz, width 2 Oct, -12.00 dB
Here are some more examples (this list will grow as I further develop my technique):
-Suspension Chords (smooth, with heavy reverb)
-Yes Strings 1 (Tales From Topographic Oceans-style—clear, with notched midrange)